Page 14 would be subject to serious skepticism if OSEC’s argument were to prevail. Requiring the Article III judiciary to assume these roles instead would further impede judicial efficien- cy. Our Conclusion Patents are classic public rights for which ad- judication, up to and including extinguish- ment of that right, may be constitutionally assigned to Article I tribunals. Additionally, by filing for a patent and thus electing the benefits of the patent system, the filer agrees to be bound by the decision of the USPTO to later have that patent revoked should it be found that the decision to grant the patent was in error. Public policy considerations fur- ther support the power of an Article I tribunal to revoke a public right. The Supreme Court should properly hold that the PTAB has the power to revoke a patent during an inter partes review proceeding. * Gregory K. Clarkson is an associate with Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker, PC. Sha- ron Shaoulian is a Judicial Extern at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California and a second-year law student at the USC Gould School of Law. 1 Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene's Energy Grp., LLC, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3727 (No. 16-712). 2 The Seventh Amendment states: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” (Continued from page 13) 3 See Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 489 (2011). 4 N. Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 67 (1982). 5 Id. 6 Granfinanciera v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33, 53 (1989). 7 Id. at 40, 51. 8 35 U.S.C. § 131. 9 MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 812 F.3d 1284, 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2015). 10 McCormick Harvesting Mach. v. Aultman & Co., 169 U.S. 606, 609–12 (1898). 11 Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 135 S. Ct. 1932, 1963 (2015). 12 Id. at 1939. 13 Id. at 1948. 14 Langenkamp v. Culp, 498 U.S. 42, 45 (1990). Inter Partes Review FBA/OC