b'Page 14FBA/OC Pitfalls in Class Settlements (Continued from page 12) *7 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2018) (resolving dispute between parties over cy pres recipient and choosing Legal Aid Association of California because organizations consumer privacy work was closely tied to purpose of class action un-der California Invasion of Privacy Act);see also See In re BankAmerica Corp. Sec. Litig. , 775 F.3d 1060 (8th Cir. 2015) (vacating approval of class action settlement and remanding for court to identify cy pres recipient more closely tailored to the interests of the class and the purposes of the underlying litigation). 13See Johnsonv.Rausch,2019WL6798980, at *6. 14Radcliffev.ExperianInfo.Solutions,Inc. , 715 F.3d 1157, 1163 (9th Cir. 2013). 15See e.g. Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc. , 380 F. Supp.3d998,1027(E.D.Cal.2019) (decreasingrequestedincentiveawardfrom $90,000to$45,000becauseotherclassmem-bers received just over $1,000 in relief);Altnor v. Preferred Freezer Servs., Inc. ,197F.Supp. 3d 746, 769 (E.D. Pa. 2016) (reducing request-edincentiveawardfrom$4,000to$1,410.80 given the class representatives limited involve-ment and failure to identity any specific risks they face by serving as a class representative); Ridgeway v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. , 269 F. Supp. 3d975,1003(N.D.Cal.2017)(reducingthe requestedincentiveawardsfrom$50,000to $15,000 after reviewing the evidence of the ac-tualworkperformedbytheclassrepresenta-tives).'